MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233506297 · doi:10.5250/legacy.28.2.0330

[no title]

2011· article· W4233506297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa Logan, Kristina Bross, Konstantin Dierks, Kelly Wisecup, Nicole N. Aljoe, Courtney Weikle-Mills, Martha L. Finch, Laura Arnold Leibman

Bibliographic record

VenueLegacy A Journal of American Women Writers · 2011
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrint cultureChapelState (computer science)JournalismHistoryMedia studiesColonialismAnthropologyArt historyClassicsSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: An Extensive Republic: Print, Culture, and Society in the New Nation, 1790–1840 Lisa M. Logan An Extensive Republic: Print, Culture, and Society in the New Nation, 1790–1840. Edited by Robert A. Gross and Mary Kelley. Volume 2 of A History of the Book in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010. xxii + 697 pp. $60.00. Appearing a decade after the first volume in this substantial series on colonial American and US book history, the long-awaited second volume, An Extensive Republic: Print, Culture, and Society in the New Nation, 1790–1840, does not disappoint. This well-illustrated, richly documented, and painstakingly edited collection of essays by experts in the field of print culture focuses on the period after the American Revolution through the early decades of the nineteenth century. Contributors include museum curators, librarians, and scholars from diverse fields, especially history, English, and interdisciplinary studies (American, cultural, museum, and women’s studies), as well as anthropology, journalism, and communications. In his editor’s introduction, Robert A. Gross observes that from the 1790s until the 1840s, US print culture “was at once local and cosmopolitan but hardly national” (6). Print thrived in localized markets, “colleges, academies, and district schools; athenaeums, libraries, lyceums; gentlemen’s learned societies, women’s reading circles, mechanics’ institutes, young men’s debating clubs, African Americans’ mutual improvement societies; state and federal governments” (5). Drawing on a vast geography and diverse interests, “print was intimately involved with the leading developments of the age” and its institutions (4). Readers, writers, reviewers, printers, publishers, and booksellers addressed themselves to the building of a particularly American literature, distinguished from its European and British roots and appropriate for citizens of the new republic. This volume concerns the shifts in print culture as the new nation accommodated itself to “the sprawl of population across space, the weakness of national authority, the devolution of power downward to the [End Page 330] states, the release of energies and the proliferation of projects to profit from the unprecedented ‘opening’ of the social order” (6). Historian and volume coeditor Mary Kelley introduces each of six sections: “A Republic in Print: Ideologies and Institutions,” “Spreading the Word in Print,” “Educating the Citizenry,” “Gendering Authorship and Audiences,” “Genres of Print,” and “New Reading and Writing Publics.” Each section includes three to seven chapters by different scholars, an editorial approach that yields a multifaceted view. For example, chapters in “Spreading the Word in Print” address the role of government and law, political print culture, journalism, copyright, communications networks, religious and reform societies, and the importance of displaying “learning” in the new republic. While none of these chapters is centered on women writers, each of the institutions and ideologies described had an impact on women authors and their publishers and audiences. For example, Richard Brown suggests that print culture in the new republic relied on revolutionary ideals, including the importance of a free press and an informed citizenry. These ideals led to women’s and girls’ extensive reading as a marker of social class and republican duty. James Green’s discussion of the rise of book publishing explains how copyright, market, and costs affected publishers and authors, including Susanna Rowson. Karen Nipps’s case study of successful Philadelphia printer Lydia Bailey illuminates the technologies of printing and selling and offers an inside view of an early-nineteenth-century print shop. Analyzing Bailey’s personal writings (day-books, workbooks, and letters), Nipps demonstrates Bailey’s adept negotiation of print culture, politics, and gender. While some sections are more overtly useful to the study of women writers than others, An Extensive Republic presents an outstanding resource for anyone interested in women’s experiences of and impact on print culture. From William S. Pretzer’s essay on journeyman printers we learn that “[w]ives, widows, and daughters labored alongside male relatives and employees as proprietors, clerks, paper folders, and compositors and, less frequently, at the press” (167). Georgia B. Barnhill’s essay on pictorial printing treats the mechanization of illustration with some attention to women illustrators and colorists and the role illustration played in women’s magazines such as Godey’s Lady’s Book. Meredith L. McGill...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7430.698

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegacy A Journal of American Women WritersSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207