MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233540948 · doi:10.2523/132431-ms

Calculating Equivalent Fracture Network Permeability of Multi-Layer-Complex Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

2010· article· en· W4233540948 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Jafari, Tayfun Babadagli

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPE Western Regional Meeting · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyLayer (electronics)Computer sciencePetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling naturally fractured reservoirs (NFRs) requires an accurate representation of fracture network permeability. Conventionally, logs, cores, seismic, and pressure transient tests are used as data base for this. Our previous attempts showed that a strong correlation exits between the fractal parameters of 2-D fracture networks and their permeability (Jafari and Babadagli, 2008, 2009a). We also showed that 1-D well (cores-logs) and 3-D reservoir data (well test) may not be sufficient in fracture network permeability (FNP) mapping and 2-D (outcrop) characteristics are needed (Jafari and Babadagli, 2009b). This paper is an extension of these studies where only 2-D (single layer, uniform fracture characteristics in z-direction) representations were used.In this paper, we considered a more complex and realistic 3-D network system. 2-D random fractures with known fractal and statistical characteristics were distributed in the x-, and y-directions. Variation of fracture network characteristics in the z-direction was presented by a multi layer system representing three different facieses with different fracture properties. Wells were placed in different locations of the model to collect 1-D fracture density and pressure transient data. In addition, five different fractal and statistical properties of the network of each layer were measured.The equivalent fracture network permeability (FNP) was calculated using a commercial software package as the base case. Using available 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D data, multivariable regression analyses were performed to obtain equivalent FNP correlations for many different fracture network realizations. The derived equations were validated against a new set of synthetic fracture networks and conditions at which 1-D, 2-D and 3-D are sufficient to map fracture network permeability were determined. The importance of the inclusion of each data type i.e. 1-D, 2-D and 3-D, in the correlations was discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPE Western Regional MeetingSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207