MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233551028 · doi:10.1109/mmm.2014.2362593

RWW Advance Program

2014· article· en· W4233551028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave Magazine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The millimeter-wave frequency band is seen as a good candidate for future 5G mobile radio networks. The availability of multiple Gigahertz of bandwidth promises to be an answer to the ever increasing data rates in access and backhaul links. At the same time new challenges arise. Mass production of RF communication circuits for this band is at its beginning. The knowledge on the outdoor channel is still very limited. New approaches for integrated steerable high gain antennas are necessary to counter the higher path loss at the high frequencies. The network architecture is expected to become more and more heterogeneous with a mixture of different cell radii and the wide deployment of small cells. With views from industrial and scientific research this workshop will give an overview on the state of the art and the huge potentials of millimeter-waves in 5G.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it