MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rhizome

2020· other· en· W4233551654 on OpenAlexaff
Gary Genosko

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUmberto Eco and Semiotics
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizomeContrast (vision)PhilosophyCenter (category theory)Deleuze and GuattariArtArt historyLiteratureEpistemologyChemistryBiologyBotanyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Rhizome” is a conceptual figure used in contrast to centered and rooted trees by French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari as well as semiotician Umberto Eco. It is principally a concept that connects horizontally by means of unlimited lines rather than nodal points – that is, without a center, anti‐genealogical, and whose breaks reconnect elsewhere. Literary source materials are noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3520.202

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Blackwell Encyclopedia of SociologySame topicUmberto Eco and SemioticsFrench-language works237,207