MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233556887 · doi:10.1002/9780470057339.vaw007

Weather Prediction

2006· other· en· W4233556887 on OpenAlexaff
Chien‐Hung Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Environmetrics · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationMeteorologyPrecipitationMomentum (technical analysis)GridNumerical weather predictionFinite differenceGlobal Forecast SystemApplied mathematicsShallow water equationsEnvironmental scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract At the heart of the weather forecast procedure is the numerical weather prediction model. The governing equations are the equations for the three spatial components of momentum, temperature, humidity and mass. The model is made from a spatial discretization of the governing equations on the entire globe using numerical methods (e.g. finite difference and spectral methods). The finite model grid size means that parameterizations of physical processes such as mixing and convective adjustment are necessary. Such models typically have millions of degrees of freedom, and frequently require supercomputers for their efficient solution. The equations are integrated forward in time, again using numerical methods, starting from some initial state. Global forecasts of meteorological quantities such as surface temperature and precipitation are made for up to about two weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of EnvironmetricsSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207