MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>L</scp> ipsius, <scp>J</scp> ustus (1547–1606)

2018· other· en· W4233575234 on OpenAlex
Erik Thomson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Diplomacy · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsFlemishStyle (visual arts)State (computer science)Order (exchange)Meaning (existential)The RenaissanceHumanismEconomic JusticeLawFoundation (evidence)ClassicsArtMedia studiesSociologyLiteraturePolitical scienceArt historyPhilosophyEpistemologyLinguisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sixteenth‐century Flemish humanist Justus Lipsius (1547–89) wrote books that helped establish a tone of political thought and style known as “neostoicism” during the late Renaissance. His critical edition of Tacitus helped make debate about that Roman historian's elusive meaning central to discussion of political ethics and reason of state. While he did not carry out an important diplomatic role, his work gave writing about politics a new, laconic style that focused on interest. At the same time, his emphasis on the necessity for order arguably inspired both those who saw a well‐ordered and disciplined state as the foundation of order, and those who saw natural law and justice as the ultimate foundation of international order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it