MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4233615480 · doi:10.24124/2002/bpgub1232

Types of motivation and student achievement in grade eight science

2002· dissertation· en· W4233615480 on OpenAlexaff
Randall T. Barr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeed for achievementPsychologyIntrinsic motivationMathematics educationAcademic achievementMotivation to learnStyle (visual arts)Goal theorySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Types ofMotivation 4Types ofMotivation and Student Achievement in Grade Eight Science Research ProblemMotivation to learn is an important concept in education.Motivation is relevant to learning because learning is an active process requiring conscious and deliberate activity (Stipek, 1998).As educators at the junior high school level, we face the daily struggle of generating intrinsic interest in the tasks that we assign our students.We have all been inspired by the student that arrives in our classroom with a genuine enthusiasm to learn and willingness to challenge and persist at the work that we present them.However, early adolescence sees a great number of students unwilling to participate in classroom activities, or only reluctantly so for expected marks and other tangible rewards.These unmotivated students can present management problems to their teachers and even become a destructive influence on the classroom environment.When examining the subject of adolescent motivation, several questions arise.What are the primary motivational styles of these junior secondary students and how are they related to achievement?If intrinsic motivation, as research suggests, is related to higher achievement, how can we move our extrinsically motivated students in this direction?Educators need to examine their teaching strategies and classroom environments for ways and means of enhancing intrinsic motivation. Literature ReviewWeiner (1979) explored these questions in his research on motivation.He identified three central dimensions of stability, locus, and control as being causally related to achievement in his attribution theory of motivation.In general, high achievement was connected to a more internal locus of control.Low achievement was often connected to Types ofMotivation 5 "learned helplessness" which is a belief that achievement is independent ofwhat a person does.A number of researchers have found a strong correlation between academic motivation and school achievement.Gottfried's (1985) research supports this view and suggests that academic intrinsic orientation is differentiated into school subject areas.She studied students in fourth and seventh grades and compared their achievement with scores on the Children's Academic Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.Her research added support to the importance of intrinsic motivation and to the varying levels of motivation across different subject areas.Hom ( 1991) argues that the results of extrinsic motivation are temporary and disappear when the reward is taken away.As extrinsic motivation is not lasting Hom suggests that increasing intrinsic motivation in classrooms will achieve more long-term results.Anderman and Maehr ( 1994) review recent research developments on motivation during adolescence and how they may be applied to educational change in the middle grades.Their focus was on the social cognitive theories of motivation.Research identifies major motivational shifts and declines at the transition from elementary to junior secondary or middle school.One of the major findings is that changes in classroom environments during this transition are directly linked to the changes in student motivation and performance.Educators are implored to attend to these important social considerations as student investment in schooling during early adolescence can have long term effects on career and life choices.Cordova and Lepper ( 1996) conducted an experiment examining the effects of Types ofMotivation 6 contextualization, personalization, and choice on enhancing intrinsic motivation.Their research premise centered on the idea that the clearly documented decline in intrinsic motivation as students progress through grade school could be explained by the requirements to perform increasingly abstract concepts in seemingly irrelevant contexts and with little or no choice as to the activities they engaged in.Using a computer based instructional unit, the authors produced a convincing body of evidence that opportunities for choice and contexts that were personally relevant and had practical significance helped to foster intrinsic motivation in students.Anderson and Midgley (1998) summarized three currently prominent motivational theories that have both special relevance for young adolescent students and implications for teachers in the classroom.These include attribution theory r.yv einer, 1979) which emphasizes the students' perception of their experiences in school; goal theory (Maehr & Midgley, 1991) which stresses the reasons students perceive for attempting tasks and achieving; and self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) that suggest students have three categories of needs: relatedness, competence, and autonomy.Task oriented goals are driven by the need to feel personal improvement and gain understanding whereas ability oriented goals are driven by the need to demonstrate competence in comparison to others.Teachers need to be aware of what students believe about their abilities and must focus on task-oriented goals rather than ability-oriented goals.Teachers must also make attempts to provide choice and decision making power to students in order to foster a sense of autonomy.Deci and Ryan (2000) examined recent research stemming from their selfdetermination theory and their six sub-category motivational continuum.The research was primarily focussed on the study of different social and contextual environments.It led the ''""4''"""' , .,,... .,1....4 .... ,... ....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports→French-language works237,207→