MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Board

2016· paratext· en· W4233642049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in law, politics, and society · 2016
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsJurisprudenceLawPublishingSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2016), "Editorial Board", Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 70), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720160000070003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Gad Barzilai Political Science Tel Aviv University, Israel Paul Berman Law George Washington University, USA Roger Cotterrell Legal Theory Queen Mary College, University of London, UK Jennifer Culbert Political Science Johns Hopkins University, USA Eve Darian-Smith Global Studies University of California, Santa Barbara, USA David Delaney Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought Amherst College, USA Florence Dore English University of North Carolina, USA David Engel Law State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Anthony Farley Law Albany Law School, USA David Garland Law New York University, USA Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller Political Science University of Hawaii, USA Laura Gomez Law University of California, Los Angeles, USA Piyel Haldar Law Birkbeck College, University of London, UK Thomas Hilbink Open Society Institute, USA Desmond Manderson Law Australian National University Jennifer Mnookin Law U.C.L.A., USA Laura Beth Nielsen Research Fellow American Bar Foundation, USA Paul Passavant Political Science Hobart and William Smith College, USA Susan Schmeiser Law University of Connecticut, USA Jonathan Simon Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley, USA Marianna Valverde Criminology University of Toronto, Canada Alison Young Criminology University of Melbourne, Australia Book Chapters Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Board A Twice-Told Story: Comparing Accounts of Capital Punishment in the Radical and Mainstream Press Why Roe Still Stands: Abortion Law, the Supreme Court, and the Republican Regime The Legal Politics of Time in Emergencies: Ticking-Time in the Israeli High Court of Justice Between Society and the State: Gendered Racialization and Muslim Americans The “Law of Alternatives”: Conflict Resolution as the Art of Reconstruction Decolonization and the Right of Self-Determination for the Pacific

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in law, politics, and societySame topicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesFrench-language works237,207