Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter provides a brief summary of what geometric methods for signal and image analysis are all about. Several applications to imaging, computer graphics, and sensor networks are discussed and illustrated. The diversified nature of these applications is powerful testimony to the practical usage of geometric methods. What is signal and image analysis? Signal and image analysis refers to the extraction of meaningful information from signals and images using digital signal and image processing techniques. In signal processing, for example, we measure, manipulate, or analyze information about a signal [1]. Such a signal is defined as a function of one or more independent variables that carries information. Examples of signals are daily high temperatures measured over a month, voltages and currents in a circuit, stock prices, our voices, music and speech, images, videos, and emails. Image processing, on the other hand, is the study of any algorithm that takes an image as input and returns an image as output, such as image enhancement, segmentation, compression, inpainting, and feature detection, to name just a few [2]. Application domains of image processing abound and include medical imaging, biology, satellite imagery, and biometrics. Other areas closely related to signal and image processing are computer vision and computer graphics. Why geometric methods? In light of the successful use of signal and image processing principles and methodologies in a broad range of areas of exceptional social and economic value, there is a growing demand from within academia and industry to devise robust computational methodologies that uncover the key geometric and topological information from signals and images. Geometry is a branch of mathematics concerned with rigid form, size, and location of objects [3], whereas topology is one of the younger fields of mathematics concerned with properties that are preserved under continuous deformations of objects, such as deformations that involve stretching, shrinking, and twisting but no tearing or gluing [4].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.397 | 0.262 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".