CAN volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Back matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
enne, en langues anglaise ou francaise, d'etudes philosophiques de haut niveau, quel que soit le domaine philosophique auxquelles elles appartiennent.Les communications sont evaluees dans l'anonymat de leurs auteurs; celles que soumettent les collegues departementaux sont referees a un comite de lecture exterieur.Les manuscrits, en quatre exemplaires, doivent etre adresses a La Secretaire a la Redaction.Canadian Journal of Philosophy, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4.Soumettre de preference des manuscrits (citations et notes comprises) dactylographies a double interligne, en prenant pour guide, dans la mesure du possible, The University of Chicago Manual of Style.Les notes doivent suivre la numerotation continue et figurer sur des feuilles independantes en annexe au manuscrit.Les manuscrits devraient etre prepare pour revaluation anonyme par les pairs.II ne doit pas par consequent contenir aucune reference, que ce soit dans le texte ou dans les notes, qui pourrait servir a identifier l'auteur.Les textes non inseres ne sont rendus qu'en cas de prepaiement des frais de poste par cheque, mandat, coupons-reponse, ou timbres canadiens.Les manuscripts peuvent egalement etre envoyes par courrier electronique en Word ou Wordperfect a Marda Schindeler a cjp@uleth.ca.Les auteurs recoivent gratuitement 25 tires-a part de leur article, lis sont pries, s'ils desirent en obtenir un plus grand nombre a titre onereux, en informer rimprimeur lors de renvoi des epreuves.Toute question de nature editoriale doit etre adressee a la secretaire administrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.791 | 0.636 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".