Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tea Anyone? / ELLA / CARTO 2019Spring 2019 saw a flurry of map activity in Edmonton.Taking advantage of Dan Duda's (Map Librarian, Memorial University) presence in Edmonton, Dan was the guest speaker at the Edmonton Map Society's Spring Meeting, held May 7.We were delighted to hear and learn about the Mazawattee Tea Atlas.The atlas, an ephemeral publication, was used by the Mazawattee Tea Company for the purpose of promoting the sales of its productstea, coffee, cocoa, chocolates, etc.However, the 20-page atlas may have had an additional purpose which was to promote the British Empire, especially for people who did not have access to public education.The publication date is c1906 and many of the marketing images for the tea company, such as people enjoying a cup of tea or tea leaves being read, are inserted throughout the atlas.Thus one could argue that the success of the tea company is part of the "glory" of the British Empire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.113 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".