MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233708190 · doi:10.7763/ijmlc.2015.v5.524

Learning Control Law of Mode Switching for Hypersonic Morphing Aircraft Based on Type-2 TSK Fuzzy Neural Network

2015· article· en· W4233708190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Computing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphingComputer scienceArtificial neural networkMode (computer interface)Control (management)Hypersonic speedArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringHuman–computer interactionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel learning method of control law of mode switching for hypersonic morphing aircraft, based on type-2 Takagi-Sugeno -Kang (TSK) fuzzy neural network, is proposed in this paper. The purpose of this method is to learn the control law of mode switching from a group of training data, in order to steadily and smoothly switch the winglets from retracting to stretching mode. In this method, taking into consideration the characteristics of type-2 fuzzy, we utilize an interval type-2 TSK fuzzy approach, the rules of which are learned from training data by back-propagation algorithm. Simulation results indicate that the proposed learning method of switching control law, based on type-2 TSK fuzzy neural network, can steadily and smoothly switch the winglets from retracting to stretching mode, providing a novel method for obtaining an excellent switching control law in situations with a group of training data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it