MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233748914 · doi:10.7748/ldp.13.7.39.s20

Face to face

2010· article· en· W4233748914 on OpenAlexaff
Thelma Agnew

Bibliographic record

VenueLearning Disability Practice · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLearning disabilityFace (sociological concept)Raising (metalworking)NursingPsychologyMedicineSociologyEngineeringDevelopmental psychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allyson Kent was an enthusiastic 18 year old when she started her learning disability nurse training. Since then, she has risen through the ranks of community and acute nursing, driven by her ambition to influence a greater number of practitioners to improve care, while raising the profile of learning disability nursing. She talked to Thelma Agnew This person is very important and has done an awful lot in their distinguished career, which of course is why they get a whole page to themselves

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6220.479

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLearning Disability PracticeSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207