MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233791770 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db235346

Japan GDP slump masks social and economic change

2018· other· en· W4233791770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional resilience and development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Consumption (sociology)RecessionEconomicsFellReal gross domestic productStormAgricultural economicsDemographic economicsLabour economicsMonetary economicsGeographyMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject Japan's changing services sector. Significance GDP fell 0.6% (annualised) in the first quarter of 2018, revised figures released on June 8 show, ending eight quarters of consecutive growth. Most sectors contributed to the downturn, including household consumption, residential construction and inventory accumulation. However, the revisions pushed up the previous quarter’s growth to 1.0% from the 0.6% initial estimate. Impacts Rising aggregate employee pay should eventually outweigh workers’ qualms over low wages and part-time work to raise household consumption. A sharply rising real trade balance reported for April suggests a GDP impetus in the next quarter. Disruptive winter storms may have caused weaker household spending; with better weather consumers could now return to the shops. The market for internet and digital services will grow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicRegional resilience and developmentFrench-language works237,207