Record W4233855589 · doi:10.7227/lh.16.1.7

Reviews: The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination, History, Historians and Autobiography, Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline, Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn, Early Modern Tragedy and the Cinema of Violence., Renaissance England's Chief Rabbi: John Selden, Marriage Relationships in Tudor Political Drama, Print Culture and the Early Quakers, Wordsworth in American Literary Culture, British Women Writers and the French Revolution: Citizens of the World, the Afterlife of Character, 1726–1826, We Met Morris: Interviews with William Morris, 1885–96, George Gissing: Voices of the Unclassed, Grant Allen: Literature and Cultural Politics at the Fin de Siecle, British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes, 1870–1900: Beauty for the People, Boys in Khaki, Girls in Print: Women's Literary Responses to the Great War, 1914–1918, Suffrage Discourse in Britain during the First World War, Clifford Geertz by His ColleaguesBuellLawrence, The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination , Blackwell Publishing, 2005, pp. x + 195, £45, £14.99 pb.PopkinJeremy D., History, Historians and Autobiography , University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. x + 339, £22.50.LambertPeter and SchofieldPhillipp (eds), Making History: An Introduction to the history and practices of a discipline , Routledge, 2004, pp. x310, £16.99 pbSpiegelGabrielle M., Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn , Routledge, 2005, pp. xiv + 274, £18.99 pb.SimkinStevie, Early Modern Tragedy and the Cinema of Violence .Palgrave, 2006, pp. viii +264, £45.RosenblattJason P., Renaissance England's Chief Rabbi: John Selden , Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. ix + 314, £60.WinkelmanMichael A., Marriage Relationships in Tudor Political Drama , Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama, Ashgate, 2005. pp. xxix + 234, £45.PetersKate, Print Culture and the Early Quakers , Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. xiii + 273, £45.PaceJoel and ScottMatthew (eds), Wordsworth in American Literary Culture , Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. xx + 248, £45.CraciunAdriana, British Women Writers and the French Revolution: Citizens of the World , Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. xii + 225, £45.BrewerDavid A., The Afterlife of Character, 1726–1826 , University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005, pp. x + 262, £39.PinkneyTony (ed.), We Met Morris: Interviews with William Morris, 1885–96 , Spire Books in association with the William Morris Society, 2005. pp. 144, $40.RyleMartin and BourneJenny (eds), George Gissing: Voices of the Unclassed , Ashgate, 2005, pp x + 164, £40.GreensladeWilliam and RodgersTerence (eds), Grant Allen: Literature and Cultural Politics at the Fin de Siecle , Ashgate, 2005 pp. 262, £47.50MaltzDiana, British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes, 1870–1900: Beauty for the People , Palgrave, 2006, pp. 290, £52.PotterJane, Boys in Khaki, Girls in Print: Women's Literary Responses to the Great War, 1914–1918 , Clarendon Press, 2005, pp. ix + 257, £50SmithAngela, Suffrage Discourse in Britain during the First World War , Ashgate, 2005, pp. 153, £40.SchwederRichard A. and GoodByron (eds), Clifford Geertz by his Colleagues , University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 160, PB, $15.00.

2007· article· en· W4233855589 on OpenAlexaff

Gary Farnell, David M. Watson, Christopher Parker, Robert Shaughnessy, Daniel Woolf, Michael Hicks, Ivan Roots, Robin Jarvis, William E. Stafford, Diana Maltz, Simon Dentith, Andrzej Gąsiorek, Julia Bush

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterature & History · 2007

Typearticle

Languageen

FieldSocial Sciences

TopicPhilippine History and Culture

Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta

Fundersnot available

KeywordsEnvironmental historyCriticismHistory of literatureBiographyLiteratureEnvironmental crisisHistoryAestheticsEnvironmental ethicsSociologyArtPhilosophyEconomic history

DOI10.7227/lh.16.1.7

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011

Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesnone

Consensus categoriesnone

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable

GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review

Teacher disagreement score0.023

Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.002	0.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.002	0.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.002	0.001
Bibliometrics	0.006	0.010
Science and technology studies	0.002	0.003
Scholarly communication	0.008	0.007
Open science	0.002	0.003
Research integrity	0.004	0.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.023	0.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007

GPT teacher head0.210

Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

Study designNot applicable

Domainnot available

GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2007

Admission routes1

Has abstractno

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueLiterature & History→Same topicPhilippine History and Culture→French-language works237,207→