MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233862327 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.7607078.v1

Accurate Kd via Transient Incomplete Separation

2019· preprint· en· W4233862327 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Sisavath, Jean Luc Rukundo, J. C. Yves Le Blanc, Victor A. Galievsky, Jiayin Bao, Sven Kochmann, Alexander S. Stasheuski, Sergey N. Krylov

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperposition principleTransient (computer programming)Dissociation (chemistry)MoleculeConstant (computer programming)Capillary actionChemistryDissociation constantSmall moleculeSeparation (statistics)Kinetic energyFunction (biology)ThermodynamicsChemical physicsChromatographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Biological systemComputer sciencePhysicsPhysical chemistryMathematicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsOrganic chemistryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current methods for finding the equilibrium dissociation constant, K d , of protein-small molecule complexes have inherent sources of inaccuracy. We introduce “Accurate K d via Transient Incomplete Separation” (AKTIS), an approach that is free of known sources of inaccuracy. Conceptually, in AKTIS, a short plug of the pre-equilibrated protein-small molecule mixture is pressure-propagated in a capillary, causing transient incomplete separation of the complex from the unbound small molecule. A superposition of signals from these two components is measured near the capillary exit as a function of time, for different concentrations of the protein and a constant concentration of the small molecule. Finally, a classical binding isotherm is built and used to find accurate K d value. Here we prove AKTIS validity theoretically and by computer simulation, present a fluidic system satisfying AKTIS requirements, and demonstrate practical application of AKTIS to finding K d of protein-small molecule complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207