MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Companionate marriage

2015· other· en· W4233863511 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Simmons

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesInterpersonal relationshipSexual relationshipPsychologySociologySocial psychologyHuman sexuality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Companionate marriage appeared in early modern to modern Europe and North America. It emphasizes the spousal relationship over economic and familial bonds between families and often implies greater equality for women than patriarchal forms of marriage. Some scholars stress general spousal companionship and love as its defining characteristics and find companionate marriage even in seventeenth‐century Europe. Others apply the term to a specific early twentieth‐century version proposed by U.S. judge Ben B. Lindsey in 1927, which encouraged sexual and emotional intimacy in particular, younger marriage, and the delay of childbearing, and also incorporated contraception and easier divorce for the childless.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Human SexualitySame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207