Friction stir processing of austenitic stainless steel cold spray coating deposited on 304L stainless steel substrate: feasibility study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work the feasibility test of friction stir processing (FSP) of 1.5 mm thick austenitic stainless steel cold spray coating deposited on 304L stainless steel substrate was performed using tungsten carbide tool. Applied FSP parameters (advance speed 50 mm/min, rotation speed 300 rpm, axial force 20 kN, tilt angle 1.5°) allowed to perform FSP treatment with a higher depth than the coating thickness. As a result, the material mixing at the coating/substrate interface was observed. The microstructure observation revealed that the coating microstructure in the stir zone was significantly modified. EBSD analysis confirmed that full material recrystallization during FSP allowed to formation of dense and uniform fine-grain structure with the mean grain size 1.9 mm. Average coating microhardness was decreased from 406 HV to 299 HV. Further FSP parameters optimization should be carried out in order to improve the process reliability and avoid any coating failure during treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".