MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234006283 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-869-5_16

Reframing

2015· book-chapter· en· W4234006283 on OpenAlexaff
Darren E. Lund, Paul R. Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueTransgressions · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingPrivilege (computing)Identity (music)PedagogySociologyWhite privilegeGender studiesWhite (mutation)PsychologyRace (biology)Political scienceSocial psychologyArtLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A long time has passed since we wrote our chapter addressing issues of racial identity and White privilege in educational contexts. Susan used the text when working with three different groups of 12 elementary teachers enrolled in an ETFO sponsored 6-week Professional Learning Community entitled Working across difference: Understanding identity, Whiteness, and critical pedagogy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransgressionsSame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207