MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temperature Coefficients of Direct Voltage Reference Standards at National Research Council Canada

2020· article· en· W4234052172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Granger, Chantal Prévost

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermistorCalibrationVoltageTemperature coefficientEnvironmental scienceMeasurement uncertaintyTemperature measurementVoltage referenceData loggerAir temperatureReference dataResearch councilElectrical engineeringMeteorologyComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We experimentally determine the temperature coefficients of direct voltage reference standards known as Fluke model 732B at the National Research Council Canada. Two units, used as references, are maintained at ambient temperature for the entire measurement duration of 4 weeks. Ambient conditions are monitored using calibrated environmental data loggers. The standards under test are placed into a temperature-regulated air bath, where calibrated environmental data loggers monitor bath conditions near the voltage terminals and near the thermistor terminals. The following quantities are measured: voltage difference between standard under test and reference standard for both 10 V and 1.018 V channels, thermistor resistance of all standards, environmental conditions both inside and outside the air bath. The air bath temperature is set to stay on alternate weeks at higher and lower temperatures following the sequence (25, 20, 25, 20) °C. The ambient temperature is between 21 and 22 °C. The entire process is repeated a second time with the locations of the standards under tests and reference standards inverted. Data analysis consists of calculating the average temperature-induced voltage and resistance changes and dividing the results by the measured temperature change to obtain the temperature coefficients. A detailed uncertainty analysis is performed. The results are compared to manufacturer specifications. The majority of our standards are better than specifications, even when taking into account the measurement uncertainties. Such experiments are beneficial, as they allow the identification of the standards with the smallest temperature coefficients to be used as direct voltage reference in client calibration services. The results can be combined into a thermistor resistance coefficient, which can be used to provide a quantitative estimate for the size of the largest temperature-induced change of resistance that has negligible effect on the voltage outputs for a given tolerance level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Electrical Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207