MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temperature Coefficients of Direct Voltage Reference Standards at National Research Council Canada

2020· article· en· W4234052172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermistorCalibrationVoltageTemperature coefficientEnvironmental scienceMeasurement uncertaintyTemperature measurementVoltage referenceData loggerAir temperatureReference dataResearch councilElectrical engineeringMeteorologyComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We experimentally determine the temperature coefficients of direct voltage reference standards known as Fluke model 732B at the National Research Council Canada. Two units, used as references, are maintained at ambient temperature for the entire measurement duration of 4 weeks. Ambient conditions are monitored using calibrated environmental data loggers. The standards under test are placed into a temperature-regulated air bath, where calibrated environmental data loggers monitor bath conditions near the voltage terminals and near the thermistor terminals. The following quantities are measured: voltage difference between standard under test and reference standard for both 10 V and 1.018 V channels, thermistor resistance of all standards, environmental conditions both inside and outside the air bath. The air bath temperature is set to stay on alternate weeks at higher and lower temperatures following the sequence (25, 20, 25, 20) °C. The ambient temperature is between 21 and 22 °C. The entire process is repeated a second time with the locations of the standards under tests and reference standards inverted. Data analysis consists of calculating the average temperature-induced voltage and resistance changes and dividing the results by the measured temperature change to obtain the temperature coefficients. A detailed uncertainty analysis is performed. The results are compared to manufacturer specifications. The majority of our standards are better than specifications, even when taking into account the measurement uncertainties. Such experiments are beneficial, as they allow the identification of the standards with the smallest temperature coefficients to be used as direct voltage reference in client calibration services. The results can be combined into a thermistor resistance coefficient, which can be used to provide a quantitative estimate for the size of the largest temperature-induced change of resistance that has negligible effect on the voltage outputs for a given tolerance level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it