Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper results from a study of democratic management in the public school, with a backdrop of the neoliberal reforms implemented in Latin America and Brazil under the guidance of international financial institutions , motivated by capitalism need to reorder itself to face a new structural crisis , leading the country to join a sociability project based on the market as a regulator of economic and social relations made possible by reforming the Brazilian state in 1990 and its effects on the administrative organization of the state of Maranhão.It deals with the influence of state reforms in the educational field , especially with the implementation of democratic management in the Brazilian public school and Maranhão , given the analysis of the effects of Law No. 14558 of 22 May 1995, in the organization of the participatory process in schools high school of the public schools in São Lois from 2007 to 2010.The procedures were: a review of the subject, analysis of official documents , related educational policies in Brazil and Maranhão in 1995 , and semi-structured interviews with members of the Collegiate School Board of the high schools of the State Public education Network of Maranhão , located in São Luis, capital state.The results indicated that through the years the experiences of Collegiate School Boards were consolidated with the expansion of the school community participation in definition of the purposes of schools , and the democratization of power, p reviously centered on the school principal figure, from the change in 2008 , the state Law that regulated the operation of Collegiate School Boards and removed the principals inate president function of these organs , passing to be exercised by a member elected from among its members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.342 | 0.160 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".