Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. Numéro 10 (automne 2019), Numéro libre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: La Transición supuso poner fin al monolingüismo instaurado por el franquismo y abrir una etapa de reconocimiento a la diversidad lingüística.A pesar de ser un período de gran transcendencia, son más bien escasos los estudios dedicados al tema.En este artículo me he limitado a estudiar las ideologías lingüísticas de los lectores del periódico El País durante la Transición, expresadas a través de su sección de cartas al director.Las opiniones de los lectores no presentan un tono uniforme, sino que abarcan todo tipo de planteamientos, a menudo antagónicos, desde aspectos generales y teóricos (lengua nacional, dialectos, oficialidad…), hasta temas más concretos, tales como la enseñanza o los derechos lingüísticos, más habituales durante los primeros años de democracia.En términos generales, en las cartas al director publicadas en El País dominan las opiniones de los lectores que expresan sus objeciones hacia la diversidad lingüística.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.229 | 0.114 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".