MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2020· article· en· W4234128596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceChinaOperations researchControl (management)EngineeringState (computer science)Computer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceLawAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 2020 4th International Workshop on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (IWAACE 2020) was held on February 21-23, 2020. Since 2017, this annual international conference has been held for three times, and this time, the fourth conference was held via online platform due to the COVID-19 crisis, which is different from the previous traditional way. Despite the distance, online IWAACE 2020 enables experts and scholars in the field of Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering to continue to communicate and discuss the state-of-the-art research with each other. It provides a flexible way for scholars and practitioners to enhance academic exchange and cooperation. We were honored to have Dr. Yuanzhu Chen, Head of Department of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, to chair IWAACE 2020. Our Technical Program Committee constitutes more than 40 experts in the field of Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering from home and abroad. During the conference, we were pleased to invite three distinguished experts to present their insightful speeches. Prof. Xinguo Yu from University of Wollongong, Australia, shared his study on Automatic Problem Solving for Basic Education. Assoc. Prof. Xiang Zhou from City University of Hong Kong, China, held a speech on the topic of Machine Learning and Control Theory. Dr. Badrul Hisham bin Ahmad from Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, talked about Design and Development of VHF FRONT-END for lightning interferometer system. List of More details of the virtual conference format, Committee members are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it