MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2020· article· en· W4234128596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceChinaOperations researchControl (management)EngineeringState (computer science)Computer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceLawAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 2020 4th International Workshop on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (IWAACE 2020) was held on February 21-23, 2020. Since 2017, this annual international conference has been held for three times, and this time, the fourth conference was held via online platform due to the COVID-19 crisis, which is different from the previous traditional way. Despite the distance, online IWAACE 2020 enables experts and scholars in the field of Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering to continue to communicate and discuss the state-of-the-art research with each other. It provides a flexible way for scholars and practitioners to enhance academic exchange and cooperation. We were honored to have Dr. Yuanzhu Chen, Head of Department of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, to chair IWAACE 2020. Our Technical Program Committee constitutes more than 40 experts in the field of Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering from home and abroad. During the conference, we were pleased to invite three distinguished experts to present their insightful speeches. Prof. Xinguo Yu from University of Wollongong, Australia, shared his study on Automatic Problem Solving for Basic Education. Assoc. Prof. Xiang Zhou from City University of Hong Kong, China, held a speech on the topic of Machine Learning and Control Theory. Dr. Badrul Hisham bin Ahmad from Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, talked about Design and Development of VHF FRONT-END for lightning interferometer system. List of More details of the virtual conference format, Committee members are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6400.483

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningFrench-language works237,207