Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 14th Annual Proteomics SymposiumFebruary 6–8, 2009, Erskine Mantra Resort, Lorne, AustraliaFor information contacthttp://www.australasianproteomics.orgTel.: 61-0-3-5983-24003rd SEProt MeetingFebruary 10–13, 2009, Pamplona, SpainFor information contacthttp://www.eupa.org/US HUPO 5th Annual ConferenceFebruary 22–25, 2009, San Diego, CAFor information contacthttp://www.ushupo.orgE-mail: ushupo@ushupo.orgTel.: 505-989-4876Proteomic Forum 2009March 29–April 2, 2009, Freie Universitat Berlin, GermanyFor information contacthttp://www.ctw-congress.de/proteomicforum2009/E-mail: proteomic@ctw-confress.de57th ASMS Conference on Mass SpectrometryMay 31-June 4, 2009, Philadelphia, PAFor information contacthttp://www.asms.orgE-mail: office@asms.orgTel.: 505-989-451721st American Peptide Society SymposiumJune 7–12, 2009, Indiana University, Bloomington, INFor information contacthttp://www.21staps.orgE-mail: APSmanager@americanpeptidesociety.orgCancer Proteomics 2009June 8–12, 2009, Dublin, IrelandFor information contacthttp://www.selectbiosciencies.com/conferences/files/Agendas2009/CP2009_Agenda.pdfE-mail: william.gallagher@ucd.ie3rd EuPa Conference - Clinical ProteomicsJune 14–17, 2009, Stockholm, SwedenFor information contacthttp://www.EuPa2009.orgE-mail: info@lakemedelsakademin.seVII European Symposium of the Protein SocietyJune 14–18, 2009, Zurich, SwitzerlandFor information contacthttp://www.proteinsociety.orgE-mail: cyablonski@proteinsociety.org6th Joint BSPR/EBI Proteomics MeetingJuly 14–16, 2009, Welcome Trust Conference Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, United KingdomFor information contacthttp://www.bspr.orgE-mail: meetings@bspr.org23rd Annual Symposium of the Protein SocietyJuly 25–29, 2009, Boston, MAFor information contacthttp://www.proteinsociety.orgE-mail: cyablonski@proteinsociety.org3rd EU Summer School in Proteomic Basics: Protein Modification and QuantificationAugust 2–8, 2009, Kloster Neustift, South Tyrol, ItalyFor information contacthttp://www.proteomic-basics.euE-mail: info@proteomic-basics.euNinth International Symposium on Mass Spectrometry in the Health and Life Sciences: Molecular and Cellular ProteomicsAugust 23–27, 2009, San Francisco, CAFor information contacthttp://msf.ucsf.edu/symposiumE-mail: sfms@cgl.ucsf.edu18th International Mass Spectrometry ConferenceAugust 30-September 4, 2009, Bremen, GermanyFor information contacthttp://www.imsc-bremen-2009.deE-mail: imsc2009@phc.uni-kiel.deHUPO VIII World CongressSeptember 26–30, 2009, Toronto, CanadaFor information contacthttp://www.hupo.org/E-mail: wehbeh.barghachie@mcgill.ca3rd ESF Functional Genomics ConferenceOctober 1–4, 2009, Innsbruck, AustriaFor information contacthttp://www.esffg2008.org/E-mail: info@tecan.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.832 | 0.780 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".