MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234184991 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.033

A34 ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT AND ORAL IRON SUPPLEMENTATION SHAPE THE COMPOSITION, RECOVERY AND FUNCTION OF THE GUT MICROBIOTA

2021· article· en· W4234184991 on OpenAlexaff
Thibault Cuisiniere, Manon Oliero, Roy Hajjar, Annie Calvé, Gabriela Fragoso, Manuela M. Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGut floraAntibioticsMicrobiologyBiologyFecesPrebioticPhysiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) induces anemia in a large proportion of patients and is usually treated with oral iron supplementation. Surgery, the main treatment for CRC, is routinely accompanied by prophylactic antibiotics to avoid infection. However, the combined effect of antibiotics and luminal iron in the gut on the microbiota and intestinal homeostasis remains unknown. Aims We aim to characterize the dynamics of gut microbiota composition and recovery from antibiotic exposure under iron-sufficient and iron-supplemented diets in mice. We will investigate how microbial shifts induced by antibiotics and iron influence the function of the gut microbiota and metabolites in the gut. Methods Mice were subjected to antibiotic treatment with different concentrations of dietary iron. The composition of the gut microbiota and its recovery after these interventions were assessed in stool samples by 16S rRNA sequencing before and after antibiotic exposure and during the recovery period. Gut microbiota functions were inferred by using the PICRUSt2 prediction tool, and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration in feces were assessed by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry. Results Recovery from antibiotics under high luminal iron concentration shifted the gut microbiota toward a Bacteroidetes phylum-dominant composition. Four bacterial species characterized as CRC markers and/or CRC initiators were significantly more abundant, and nitrogen and pentose phosphate metabolism were higher after recovery under oral iron supplementation. Antibiotic exposure induced a long-term increase in SCFAs linked to gut inflammation, propionate and succinate, and was independent of luminal iron concentration. For mice recovering from antibiotics under high luminal iron concentration, they showed a lack of recovery in baseline levels of butyrate, a SCFA that inhibits cancer cell proliferation in the gut. Conclusions Gut microbiota recovery from antibiotic exposure under oral iron supplementation is frequent in CRC patients, but is also common in the general population. This study identifies possible deleterious effects of the concomitance of these two disruptive agents of the gut microbiota and may lead to modifications in the management of anemia in patients with CRC. Funding Agencies CIHR Bourse de Mérite Rougier-Armandie en recherche médicale de la Faculté de médecine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→