MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234185301 · doi:10.1080/714031141

Effect of CD40 ligand on the course of murine histoplasmosis

2002· article· en· W4234185301 on OpenAlexaff
L. J. Wheat, M. Durkin, C. Schnizlein-Bick, E. Bassey, S. Kohler, P. Connolly, J. Goldberg, T. Garringer, E. Brizendine, E. K. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Mycology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsResearch & Development Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoplasmosisAmphotericin BSpleenHistoplasmaMicrobiologyImmune systemCD40ImmunologyInoculationBiologyRatónMycosisHistoplasma capsulatumAntifungalIn vitroCytotoxic T cellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD40 ligand-CD40 ligation is important in the development of T-cell-mediated immune responses.The purpose of this study was to examine the role of CD40L in recovery from histoplasmosis using a murine model of intratracheally induced infection.B6C3F 1 mice were infected intratracheally with Histoplasma capsulatum yeast and monitored for clearance of the organism from the lungs and spleen.CD40L treatment was begun on either day 2 or 2 post inoculation and continued until day 14 in CD4-depleted animals and from day 2 to day 4 in nonimmunosuppressed animals.Amphotericin B treatment was begun four days following inoculation and given every other day for 10 days.CD40L reduced fungal burden by less than one log when started two days before infection but did not act synergistically with low-dosage amphotericin B (0.2 mg kg 1 qod) in CD4 depleted mice.Low-dose amphotericin B, CD40L, and the combination of the two failed to lower the fungal burden in a second experiment using a more virulent isolate of the same strain of H. capsulatum in CD4-depleted mice.Furthermore, CD40L did not increase the concentrations of IFN-g , IL-12 or IL-10 in the lungs or spleens of infected animals.In summary, CD40L had minimal or no effect on the course of infection in this murine model of histoplasmosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical MycologySame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207