Dynamique des études de genre appliquées aux objets médiatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certain.e.s frileux/-ses -rfractaires ( ?) serait-on tentes d'ajouterregretteront ce qui semble leurs yeux une (omni)prsence intrusive du genre dans la construction de nos objets de recherche et de nos disciplines 1 . D'autres l'inverse dploreront des rsistances aux approches Genre et leur faible visibilit au regard de la profusion et de la qualit des travaux et chercheur.e.s engag.e.s dans ce champ de recherche. Cette nouvelle livraison de la revue Genre en sries propose de se saisir de cette conflictualit pour mettre l'honneur la diversit des travaux qui mobilisent le genre, comme concept et comme mthodologie, dans le champ acadmique franais, mais aussi pour faire trace d'un vnement significatif de l'entreprise de valorisation et de mise en visibilit de ces recherches, savoir le congrs des tudes de Genre organis en septembre 2014 dans les locaux de l'ENS Lyon par l'Institut du Genre 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".