MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234208561 · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000806

Authors’ Response

2020· letter· en· W4234208561 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Firth, Wolfgang Marx, Rebekah Carney, Scott Teasdale, Marco Solmi, Brendon Stubbs, Felipe Barreto Schuch, André F. Carvalho, Felice N. Jacka, Jerome Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychosomatic Medicine · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsFirthPhilosophyPsychoanalysisHumanitiesArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Firth, Joseph PhD; Marx, Wolfgang PhD; Carney, Rebekah PhD; Teasdale, Scott B. PhD; Solmi, Marco MD; Stubbs, Brendon PhD; Schuch, Felipe B. PhD; Carvalho, André F. MD; Jacka, Felice PhD; Sarris, Jerome PhD Author Information

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychosomatic MedicineSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207