MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234219117 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11691

Software-defined Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Trust Management

2016· dissertation· en· W4234219117 on OpenAlexaff
Dajun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkMobile ad hoc networkOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolWireless ad hoc networkVehicular ad hoc networkRouting protocolDistributed computingWireless Routing ProtocolAd hoc On-Demand Distance Vector RoutingDistance-vector routing protocolAd hoc wireless distribution serviceDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingAdaptive quality of service multi-hop routingDynamic Source RoutingRouting (electronic design automation)Computer securityWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) have become popular in different areas.In MANETs, mobile nodes can join or leave the network freely.Because of the mobility of nodes and open wireless medium, MANETs are vulnerable to security attacks.In this thesis, we propose a novel framework of software-defined MANETs with trust management.Specifically, we separate the forwarding plane in MANETs from the control plane, which is responsible for the control functionality, such as routing protocols and trust management in MANETs.Using the on-demand distance vector routing (TAODV) protocol as an example, we present a routing protocol named software-defined trust based ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing (SD-TAODV).Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed softwaredefined MANETs with trust management.iii First of all, I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor, Professor F. Richard Yu for his tremendous time and efforts spent in leading, supporting and encouraging me in the course of my thesis and study.It would not be able for me to finish my thesis without his help and I will always keep to follow his instructions and inspiration to my professional career.I would also thank my colleagues for their understanding and friendship during the time we spent together.Finally, I would like to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207