MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234222194 · doi:10.1109/pads.1995.404296

A fast asynchronous GVT algorithm for shared memory multiprocessor architectures

2002· article· en· W4234222194 on OpenAlexaff
Zhonge Xiao, F. Gomes, Brian Unger, John J. Cleary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Waikato
KeywordsComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationParallel computingCorrectnessOverhead (engineering)Distributed computingMultiprocessingShared memoryDistributed memoryDistributed shared memorySynchronization (alternating current)Inter-process communicationScheme (mathematics)Parallel algorithmMemory managementAlgorithmUniform memory accessOverlayOperating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The computation of Global Virtual Time is of fundamental importance in Time Warp based Parallel Discrete Event Simulation Systems. Shared memory multiprocessor architectures can support interprocess communication with much smaller overheads than distributed memory systems. This paper presents a new, completely asynchronous, Gvt algorithm which provides very fast and accurate Gvt estimation with significantly lower overhead than previous approaches. The algorithm presented is able to support more efficient memory management, termination, and other global control mechanisms. The Gvt algorithm described enables any Time Warp entity to compute Gvt at any time without slowing down other entities, in particular those executing on the critical path. Experimental results are presented for a shared memory Time Warp system that employs a two tiered distributed memory management scheme. The proof of the correctness and the accuracy of the algorithm are also presented. Finally, some suggestions on possible further optimization of the implementation are given.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207