Morphological analysis of spatio-temporal patterns for the segmentation of cyclic human activities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work describes a new method for the temporal segmentation of human actions based on a 2D inter-frame similarity plot. This similarity matrix contains relevant information for the analysis of cyclic and symmetric human activities, where the motion performed during the first semi-cycle is repeated in the opposite direction during the second semi-cycle. Thus, the pattern associated to aperiodic activity in the similarity matrix is rectangular and decomposable into elementary units. We propose a morphology-based approach for the detection and analysis of activity patterns. Pattern extraction is further used for the detection of the temporal boundaries of the cyclic symmetric activities. Result evaluation approach is based on a statistical estimation of the ground truth segmentation and on a confidence ratio for temporal segmentations. Research reported in This work was supported by a discovery grant of the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it