MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geomorphic Thresholds

2017· other· en· W4234276337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Encyclopedia of Geography · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesTransitive relationTransformation (genetics)State (computer science)State spacePath (computing)Process (computing)Simple (philosophy)MathematicsComputer scienceStatistical physicsControl theory (sociology)GeologyControl (management)PhysicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmStatisticsArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thresholds of the first kind refer to boundaries or discontinuities in space or time; thresholds of the second kind denote a transformation of state or intensity associated with an ongoing process. Threshold crossings may be forced by processes working within a system (intrinsic thresholds) or by a change in some extrinsic control (extrinsic threshold). Thresholds may also be classified according to whether they are abrupt (sharp), transitional, or associated with rate discontinuities. Threshold crossings may be simple, when the new state is immediately assumed, or complex, when the system approaches the new state by some nondirect path. Finally, thresholds may be considered according to whether a reverse crossing may restore the system to its previous state (transitive) or not (intransitive).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it