MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Palliative Care Transitions from Acute Care to Community-Based Care—A Systematic Review (FR420A)

2020· article· en· W4234297689 on OpenAlexaff
Sarina R. Isenberg, Tieghan Killackey, Allison Kurahashi, Chris Walsh, Kirsten Wentlandt, Emily Lovrics, Mary Scott, Mark Bernstein, Michelle Howard, Peter Tanuseputro, Russell Goldman, Camilla Zimmermann, Rebecca A. Aslakson, Stéphanie Saunders

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pain and Symptom Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMount Sinai HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaSinai Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLMedicinePalliative carePsychological interventionContext (archaeology)MEDLINEInclusion (mineral)Family medicineDescriptive statisticsSystematic reviewNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.016
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pain and Symptom ManagementSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207