MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bretton Woods Conference (1944)

2018· other· en· W4234342306 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Diplomacy · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertibilityLiberian dollarDevaluationBalance of paymentsMonetary hegemonySpecial drawing rightsEconomicsInternational financeCurrencyReserve currencyDominance (genetics)Monetary systemInternational economicsMonetary policyFinanceMonetary economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, better known as Bretton Woods for the New Hampshire hotel where it took place in July 1944, represented a crucial step in the Allies' plan to develop institutions intended to prevent economic instability after the Second World War. It established the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which became the core of the World Bank. The agreement reflected the economic dominance of the United States by making the US dollar's convertibility to gold the keystone of the international financial system. This system hoped to use pegged, but adjustable, exchange rates and restricted capital flows to minimize balance‐of‐payments deficits and prevent competitive currency devaluation. When the United States accrued persistent trade deficits, the system broke down, and in August 1971 Richard Nixon ended the system by unilaterally ending the conversion of US dollars to gold. Nonetheless, the Bretton Woods institutions continue to support international economic cooperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2390.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of DiplomacySame topicState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceFrench-language works237,207