MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234372129 · doi:10.1139/f00-088

Growth variation and water mass associations of larval silver hake (<i>Merluccius bilinearis</i>) on the Scotian Shelf

2000· article· en· W4234372129 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Jennifer A. Jeffrey, Christopher T. Taggart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMerlucciusOtolithBiologyZooplanktonLarvaPredationFisheryHakeEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Otolith microstructure is shown to be ideal for assessing age and growth in silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis) larvae and is used to examine growth among individuals and cohorts. Larvae collected from Western Bank, Scotian Shelf, in September, October, and November 1997 defined three monthly cohorts identified using inferred hatch dates. Total length-at-age relations did not differ between the September and October cohorts despite substantial differences in growing degree-day (435 versus 318°C·d) and zooplankton (potential prey index) wet biomass (0.15 versus 0.27 g·m-3). Larvae collected off-bank in September exhibited a growth advantage of >0.10 mm·d-1 relative to larvae collected on-bank. Greater variability in growth rate within cohorts and among water masses implies that cohort-averaged growth and survival (based on growth) estimates can be biased by overrepresentation of a single water mass. The focus on growth variability, and its relationship to survival, should be on individuals within cohorts and not on cohort-averaged estimates. We hypothesize that growth, and perhaps survival, in silver hake larvae on the Scotian Shelf is most easily explained by variation in physical oceanographic processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→