Impact of a multidimensional intervention programme applied to families at risk for child neglect
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of an intervention programme applied to families at risk for child neglect. Twenty-nine families were recruited through a Local Community Services Centre (LCSC) and were assigned to two groups: (1) the first group participated in a multidimensional eco-systemic intervention programme called the Personal, Family and Community Help Program (PFCHP); and (2) the second group underwent psychosocial intervention that was provided as part of regular LCSC services and focused mainly on the social worker–family relationship. Pre-test measures were obtained at the beginning of intervention for both groups and a follow-up was held 24 months later. Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated that both forms of intervention were associated with improved parent–child relationship and the reduction of parental stress, depression and the potential for child abuse and neglect. However, PFCHP participants showed multiple indications of improvement in their social and marital relationships, which was not the case for LCSC participants. The conclusion outlines the need for a long-term intervention process for families at high risk for child neglect and the necessity of addressing multiple dimensions of family life if lasting changes are to be expected. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. L'objectif de cette étude est d'évaluer les effets d'un programme d'intervention pour familles à risque de négligence parentale. Vingt-neuf familles ont été recrutées par un Centre Local de Services Communautaires (CLSC) et réparties en deux groupes (1) les participants à un programme d'intervention éco-systémique, le Programme d'Aide Personnelle, Familiale et Communautaire (PAPFC); et (2) le groupe ayant bénéficié des services psycho-sociaux offerts en CLSC, axés principalement sur la relation travailleur social et la famille. Des mesures quantitatives et qualitatives ont été prises pour les deux groupes, en début d'intervention et 24 mois après. L'ensemble des analyses démontre que les deux formes d'intervention sont associées à des améliorations de la situation des familles: changements dans la relation parent–enfant, réduction du stress parental, de la dépression et du potentiel d'abus et de négligence. Néanmoins, les participants au PAPFC montrent une amélioration de leurs relations sociales et maritales, ce qui n'est pas le cas pour l'autre groupe. Les résultats sont discutés en faveur d'une intervention à long terme et s'adressant aux divers besoins des familles à risque. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it