MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234404219 · doi:10.1109/tdc.1991.169618

Comparison of thyristor switched capacitor and voltage source GTO inverter compensators for single phase feeders

2002· article· en· W4234404219 on OpenAlexafffund
D.A. Jacobson, R. Menzies

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1991 IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsThyristorIntegrated gate-commutated thyristorInverterMOS-controlled thyristorCapacitorSwitched capacitorControl theory (sociology)Compensation (psychology)Thyristor driveVoltageStatic induction thyristorGate turn-off thyristorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of small static compensators for the control of voltage on single-phase distribution feeders is investigated. A candidate feeder system is examined to determine the size and type of reactive compensation required. The single-phase design of a thyristor switched capacitor type compensator is compared with an advanced gate-turn off (GTO) thyristor voltage source inverter type of compensator. The advantages of the three-phase advanced compensator are not evident in the single-phase design.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1991 IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution ConferenceSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207