The panmictic nature of<i>Neisseria meningitidis</i>serogroup B during a period of endemic disease in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three hundred and one (301) strains of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, isolated from patients with meningococcal disease during the years 19941996, were subjected to multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, serotyping, and serosubtyping. Based on the analyses of 14 enzyme loci, 177 electrophoretic types (ETs) were identified. Of these, 136 were represented by single isolates and 41 were represented by multiple isolates (range 231). The mean genetic diversity for isolates was 0.444 and for ETs was 0.440. The index of association (IA) between loci was 0.530 ± 0.08 for isolates and 0.256 ± 0.10 for ETs. Cluster analysis revealed the presence of 39 lineages each represented by a single ET or clusters of ETs. The most common serotypes were 4, 15, and 14 and accounted for 84 (28.0%), 53 (17.6%), and 32 (10.6%) of the isolates, respectively, and were dispersed amongst 46 ETs (1122), 35 ETs (3165), and 26 ETs (1876), respectively. The 109 (36.6%) nontypable (NT) isolates were amongst 74 ETs (6177). The mean genetic diversity for serotypes 4, 15, and 14 and NT isolates was 0.368, 0.371, 0.343, and 0.442, respectively, and for ETs was 0.363, 0.354, 0.397, and 0.440, respectively. Combinations of serotypes and serosubtypes (number of isolates) that occurred most frequently were 4:P1.14 (17), 14:P1.16 (16), NT:P1.16 (16), 15:P1.16 (13), and NT:P1.13 (13). The majority of group B disease in Canada during 19941996 was caused by meningococci of considerable genetic diversity, and reflects a situation of endemic disease. However, the results also indicate that organisms belonging to the ET-5 complex, which has been responsible for outbreaks of group B disease globally for several decades, have been introduced into the country.Key words: meningococcal, genotypes, serotypes, serosubtypes, Neisseria meningitidis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".