Addition of a c-myc epitope tag within the VEGF protein does not affect in vitro biological activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been strongly implicated in diseases involving neovascularization. VEGF exists in as many as six different isoforms, each showing a unique pattern of tissue distribution and activity. To investigate the effect of individual VEGF isoform overexpression in neovascular disease models, we inserted c-myc epitope tags into the three VEGF isoforms expressed in retinal pigment epithelial cells, VEGF121, VEGF165, and VEGF189. We found that the 12-amino acid insertion between the receptor binding and heparin binding domains did not affect VEGF transcription, translation, or secretion. In addition, VEGF isoforms containing the c-myc epitope tag were able to stimulate endothelial cell proliferation as efficiently as non-tagged VEGF isoforms and they could be individually identified by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry using the c-myc epitope specific monoclonal antibody 9E10.Key words: Vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF, c-myc epitope tag, immunocytochemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".