MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234431329 · doi:10.1063/1.2219324

Planetary Systems

2006· article· en· W4234431329 on OpenAlexaff
Pawel Artymowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExoplanetPlanetProtoplanetSolar SystemPlanetary systemPhysicsDebris diskObservableAstrobiologyAstrophysicsCircumstellar diskAstronomyProtoplanetary disk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a non‐technical introduction to some current topics in planetary system origins, relevant to the understanding of a decade’s worth of discovery and characterization of systems other than the solar system. We consider both the radial velocity exoplanets (planets outside the solar system) and the dust disks known as transitional and debris disks, which are natural and conspicuous parts of young planetary systems. Our emphasis is on new dynamical theories, including new concepts in disk‐planet interaction and the resultant three types of migration of protoplanets in disks. Migration is considered the key issue for planet survival during the T Tauro disk phase. We also discuss a variety of observable features arising from the dust‐gas coupling in the presence of stellar radiation pressure. Nonaxisymmetric features have been both observed and predicted theoretically, although detailed comparison has not yet been performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1790.075

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207