MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234511307 · doi:10.3406/lha.2007.1075

Le collège Sainte-Barbe de Paris : des frères Labrouste à Ernest Lheureux

2007· article· en· W4234511307 on OpenAlexaff
Annabelle Lebarbé

Bibliographic record

VenueLivraisons d histoire de l architecture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sainte Foy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionScope (computer science)ArchitectureEducational institutionArt historyArtHumanitiesHistoryVisual artsSociologyPedagogySocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"The College Sainte-Barbe in Paris : from the Labrouste brothers to Ernest Lheureux", by Annabelle Lebarbé. Opened in 1460 in the heart of the Quartier Latin, then forced to close down in 1793, the College Sainte-Barbe is brought back to life by Victor de Lanneau in 1798. The successive headmasters of the school will have it developped and enlarged with new buildings, first the construction of the secondary school by the Labrouste brothers in 1840, then the one of the preparatory school by Ernest Lheureux in 1881-1884. The example of Sainte-Barbe turns to be of the utmost significance at a time when a policy in favour of secondary education and suitable architectural answers slowly take shape. As an undenominational private institution, Sainte-Barbe has full scope to carry out its own innovative designs as regards school architecture and is enabled to corne up against financial difficulties thanks to the deep "esprit de corps" of its former pupils. Thus the institution is among the first ones to have proper brand new schools built.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLivraisons d histoire de l architectureSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207