MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234516819 · doi:10.1017/s031716710011813x

CJN volume 37 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

2010· article· en· W4234516819 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrick McDonald, Nicolas Dupré, Robert Laforce, Means What, Familial, Joël Oger, Mona Alkhawajah, José Francisco Téllez‐Zenteno, Martin Parent, André Parent, Cian O′Kelly, Kenneth Butcher, B. Elaine Marchak, J. N. Findlay, Pascal Durand-Martel, Dominic Tremblay, Catherine Brodeur, Nancy Paquet, Sarah Lord, Charles Tatar, Sandy Wells, Asuri N. Prasad, Georg Hoffmann, Rachel Butler, B Bealtie, Umamon Puang Thong, Emily Dwosh, Colleen Guimond, Howard Feldman, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Peter St, A George-Hyslop, H. Xia, Zhan-Feng Niu, Hui Ma, Shuan-Zhu Cao, Shao-Cai Hao, Zhong-Tao Liu, Fan Wang, Mahmoud Reza Azarpazhooh, Naghmeh Mokhber, Elias Orouji, Brian R. Chambers, Mohammad Reza Hatef, Zahra Rez, Sima Di, Mohsen Sedighi, Arash Eoroghipoor, Morteza Velayati, Leonilda Bilo, Maria Fulvia de Leva, Rosa Alba De Meo, Dalia Rotstein, Muhammad Mamdani, Paul O’Connor, Peyman Shirani, Ali Jawaid, Paolo Moretti, Elham Lahijani, Alicia R. Salamone, Paul E. Schulz, Everton Neuroimaging, Philippe Huot, François Émond, Frederick A. Zeiler, Greg L. Bryan, Young London, Ridacteurs Associes, A Michael, Shevell Montreal, Timothy Benstead Halifax, Mike London, Serge Gauthier Verdun, Robert London, Douglas Calgary, James Toronto, Robert Lee, Robert Winnipeg, Jorge London, Richard Desbiens, Quebec City, David Fortin, Mark Calgary, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Germany Michael, Hill Calgary, Jackson Winnipeg, Daniel Ottawa, Terence Calgary, Adrian James, Perry Toronto, Suchowersky Calgary, Brian Toyota, Brian G. Weinshenker, Samuel Wiebe, Conseil De Redaction, Richard Toronto, David London, Robert Hammond, Andrew Saskatoon, Mary London

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)Alberta Bible College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Front (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Content (measure theory)Action (physics)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceMathematicsGeographyEngineeringPhysicsMeteorologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Where are we Going with Drugs to Treat MS? Will Cost Continue to Increase? Ou allons-nous avec les traitements de la SEP? Les couts vont-ils continuer a augmenter?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207