Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim and ScopeBipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses.It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area.Papers on biochemistry, physiology, neuropsychopharmacology, neuroanatomy, neuropathology, genetics, brain imaging, epidemiology, phenomenology, clinical aspects, and therapeutics of bipolar disorders will be considered.In particular, papers that provide leads for development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders are specially welcome.The journal will also consider submissions on the topics of schizoaffective disorders and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders.The journal will accept full-length research papers, brief reports, invited editorials, commentaries, review articles, letters to the editor, and case reports of unusual interest. Information for subscribersBipolar Disorders is published in eight issues per year.Institutional subscription prices for 2016 are: Online: 623 (UK), 791 (Europe), $1045 (The Americas), $1217 (Rest of World).Prices are exclusive of tax.Asia-Pacifi c GST, Canadian GST and European VAT will be applied at the appropriate rates.For more information on current tax rates, please go to www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/tax-vat.The price includes online access to the current and all online back fi les to January 1 st 2011, where available.For other pricing options including access information and terms and conditions, please visit www.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.152 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".