MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Privacy Management Architecture Privacy Technologies

2008· book-chapter· en· W4234530983 on OpenAlexaff
Larry Korba, Ronggong Song, George Yee

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentArchitecturePrivacy by DesignComputer scienceInformation privacyPrivacy softwareComputer securityService-oriented architectureService (business)Privacy protectionInternet privacyWorld Wide WebWeb serviceBusinessSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There have been a number of recent developments in architectures for privacy management. These architectures may be applied to the development of e-services. This chapter describes some driving forces and approaches for the development and deployment of a privacy architecture for e-services and reviews several architectures that have been proposed or developed for managing privacy. The chapter offers the reader a quick tour of ideas and building blocks for creating privacy-protection enabled e-services and describes several privacy information flow scenarios that can be applied in assessing any e-service privacy architecture. The chapter concludes with a summary of the work covered and a discussion of some outstanding issues in the application of privacy architectures to e-services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.020
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207