MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234534025 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02342213mtgabs

Combined Two-phase Co-flow and Counter-flow in a Gas Channel/Porous Transport Layer Assembly

2020· article· en· W4234534025 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Beale, Martin Andersson, Norbert Weber, Holger Marschall, Werner Lehnert

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumMechanicsCapillary actionPorosityFlow (mathematics)BubbleMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymer electrolyte fuel cells and electrolyzers are low temperature devices whereby both gases and liquids intermingle within the porous transport layers and open channels. The flow of the liquid and gas is of paramount importance to the functioning of the unit. This motion is poorly understood. Cell-level models typically employ volume-averaging techniques to describe the motion of the flowing reactants and products. Until recently, detailed analysis of the two-phase liquid gas mixture, employing front-tracking methods has proved too computationally prohibitive. Previous work [1,2] has considered the motion of liquid drops in gas channels, it being assumed the drops are formed at specific nucleation sites on the sides of the channels. The present work considers a detailed numerical analysis of combined liquid-gas co-flow in a gas channel with liquid-gas counter-flow in a porous transport layer (PTL). The geometry considered is a ‘T-shape’ with the porous transport layer in the form of a thin rectangular prism of dimensions 0.5×0.5×0.1 mm3 located at the base of the ‘T’, and the gas flowing across the top channel, as shown in Fig. 1. The PTL is reproduced by digital reconstruction of nano-computer tomography images of a Freudenberg H2315 PTL as a stereolithography file*, see Figure 2(a). From this, the domain is tessellated with an unstructured castellated, or octree, type mesh, Fig. 2(b). Liquid water is introduced at an electrode at the base of the PTL and gaseous oxygen is simultaneously removed by electrochemical reduction; the resulting liquid-gas counter-flow in the porous transport layer effects liquid droplets being entrained in co-flow in the gas channel and being convected downstream, thereafter. The equations of mass and momentum are solved by means of the open source software library OpenFOAM. A volume-of-fluid approach based on the multidimensional universal limiter for explicit solution was employed. At t = 0, the channel is presumed to be filled with gas, and the PTL partially saturated with liquid water. Gas is introduced at the inlet at a given velocity. Water is added and gas removed at the electrode (counter-flow), whereas both water and gas are removed at the outlet (co-flow). At the channel walls and on the PTL fibres, the static contact angle is fixed. Some results are shown in Fig. 3(a-d). It can be seen that the location and size of the drops shed varies somewhat in space and time, i.e., there is a stochastic component to the motion of the fluid, due to the spatial distribution of the fibres in the PTL, the transient shedding process, and the merging of liquid streams flowing into the gas channel. Nonetheless a definite periodicity is observed, with drops being injected into the channel at a fairly regular rate. Some relatively minor switching with time is observed within the PTL due to the random packing of fibres, but these transients are relatively quiescent. In addition to providing important new information about flow and pressure losses in electrochemical cells as a function of current density and stoichiometry, the present model may be also used to enumerate properties such as relative permeability which can subsequently be employed in cell-scale models. * The authors wish to thank Mr. Eugen Hoppe for constructing a stereolithography file of the porous material used in this study. [1] Andersson, M., Beale, S.B., Reimer, U., Lehnert, W., Stolten, D., Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2018, 43(5): 2961-2976. [2] Andersson, M., Mularczyk, A., Lamibrac, A., Beale, S.B., Eller, J., Lehnert, W., Büchi, F.N., J. Power Sources, 2018. 404: 159-171. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→