Frederic Stanley Kipping Award In Silicon Chemistry: Michael Brook
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sponsor: Dow Corning Citation: For his creative approaches to the synthesis of siloxane materials with controlled morphology, including silica and silicones, and the application of these strategies to biomaterials. Current position: professor of chemistry and chemical biology, McMaster University; cofounder and chief scientific officer, EnRoute Interfaces Education: B.Sc., chemistry, University of Toronto; Ph.D., chemistry, McGill University Brook on what inspires him: “I have always been curious about ‘how stuff works.’ I really enjoy learning about new technical problems, both academic and industrial, particularly from specialists outside of silicone chemistry. In my experience, these interactions lead to creative moments that allow us to try to design silicones to meet new challenges and, importantly, to broaden my appreciation of different aspects of science. It’s fascinating to approach new problems from outside one’s comfort zone: lots of mistakes are always accompanied by lots of creative opportunities.” What his colleagues say: “Brook developed pragmatic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".