MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234581803 · doi:10.15760/etd.5322

A history of the street railway systems of Vancouver, Washington, 1889-1926

2000· report· en· W4234581803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Freece

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityReal estateEconomic historyImmigrationEconomyFinanceEngineeringBusinessHistoryArchaeologyEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decade of the 1880s was a time of unprecedented development in the Pacific Northwest. Railroads were being constructed, immigration was high, lumber in demand and statehood for Washington appeared imminent. Vancouver, Washington, benefited from this prosperity. In 1888, a Portland firm built a steam powered railway from East Portland, through its real estate development, Woodlawn, to the Vancouver ferry. The success of this enterprise in aiding the sale of real estate was observed by several Vancouver men who formed the Columbia Land and Improvement Company to promote the sale of their property. The company constructed a horse drawn street railway in 1889 from Vancouver's business district north to its development in Vancouver Heights. The railway had mixed financial success and was sold to a Portland man, George B. Markle, in 1892. He electrified it and operated the line until his financial empire crumbled in the Panic of 1893. After several years of operation in the hands of a receiver, the railway ceased running in 1895, and was dismantled two years later. With the announcement that James J. Hill was going to build the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway through Vancouver in 1895, the area's prosperity was renewed. A number of franchise seekers vied for the opportunity to build a street railway in Vancouver, and in 1906 Walter H. Moore was granted permission. Before the line's construction was completed, Moore went bankrupt in the recession of 1907. A group of Vancouver men took over building it until 1908 when the Vancouver Traction Company was formed. This firm completed the line and operation commenced that year. In 1910 a subsidiary, the Clarke County Development Company was incorporated to build an interurban line east of town to Orchards and Sifton, an area in which they had real estate interests. The system did not pay as the investors had hoped, and in 1911 it was sold to the Washington - Oregon Corporation, a utility holding company. It managed the line until forced into receivership in 1914. In the fall of 1915 the company was reorganized under the name of the North Coast Power Company. During the next eight years the expense of operating the line increased rapidly with the wartime inflation of labor and materials. The line had been cheaply constructed and was in need of major overhauling. Jitneys, buses, and automobiles were providing increasing competition, but this was somewhat abated by the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207