MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234586056 · doi:10.7765/9781526103567.00015

Bibliography

2015· book-chapter· en· W4234586056 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anne Wohlcke

Bibliographic record

VenueManchester University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OxfordUniversity of CambridgeLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPrinceton University
KeywordsAppealStatutory lawPoliticsPolitical scienceCompensation (psychology)State (computer science)LawPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compleat English secretary, and newest academy of complements.Containing the true art of indicting letters, suitable to the capacity of youth and age ... To which is added.1.The art of good breeding and behaviour, ... 6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4210.333

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManchester University Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207