Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Journal of Cultural Property is a peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers and other materials representing a broad set of perspectives on problems relating to cultural property, cultural heritage, and related issues.Contributions are welcome from the wide variety of fields implicated in the debateslaw, anthropology, public policy, archaeology, art history, preservation, museum-, tourism-, and heritage studies-and from a variety of perspectives and interestsindigenous, Western, and non-Western; academic, professional and amateur; consumers and producers-to promote meaningful discussion of the complexities, competing values, and other concerns that form the environment within which these disputes exist.The IJCP accepts contributions in English (though exceptions may be made) of two types:Articles should be sent to the Editor, preferably by email to culturalproperty@ cambridge.org(or mailed to Alexander Bauer, Department of Anthropology, Queens College, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367), and may address any issue regarding tangible or intangible cultural property and heritage, and may draw upon scholarship from such diverse fields as anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, law, museum studies, public policy, and tourism management, among others.Because of the interdisciplinary nature of the subject matter, authors should refrain from employing subject-specific jargon where possible, and should generally keep in mind that diverse readership may require that certain concepts be explained in greater detail than they are accustomed.Of particular interest are articles which contain a pragmatic dimension and propose new directions for policy and practice.Submitted manuscripts should generally be between 6000 and 9000 words, although longer pieces may be considered, and should adhere to the following style guidelines: a.All
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.737 | 0.643 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".