MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234641352 · doi:10.2196/preprints.8539

Exosomal microRNAs as potential circulating biomarkers in gastrointestinal tract cancers: A systematic review protocol (Preprint)

2017· review· en· W4234641352 on OpenAlexaff
Elmira Gheytanchi, Zahra Madjd, Leila Janani, Arezoo Rasti, Roya Ghods, Fatemeh Atyabi, Mohammad Hossein Asadi Lari, Sadegh Babashah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrovesiclesMedicinemicroRNABiomarkerMeta-analysisSystematic reviewExosomeOncologyLiquid biopsyWeb of scienceDiagnostic biomarkerBioinformaticsCancerInternal medicineMEDLINEBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are being suggested as potential diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The encapsulation of miRNAs in nano-sized exosomes makes them more resistant to degradation. Therefore, they may be useful diagnostic biomarkers for the detection of cancer in body fluids, especially in the serum of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to systematically review primary studies and identify the miRNA profiles of serum exosomes of GI cancers. METHODS This systematic review will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA-P) guidance. Relevant studies will be identified through a comprehensive search of the following main electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar (up to July 2017). Full copies of articles will be identified by a defined search strategy. The quality assessment of the included studies will be performed by the guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies. Evaluation of the heterogeneity among the primary studies will be performed by χ2 and I2 statistical tests. RESULTS The analysis of circulating exosomal miRNA profiles provides attractive screening and non-invasive diagnostic tools for the majority of solid tumours including GI cancers. There is limited information regarding the relationship between serum exosomal miRNA profiles and the pathological condition of patients with different GI cancers. Since there is no specific biomarker for GI cancers, we aim to suggest a number of circulating exosomal miRNA candidates as potential multifaceted GI cancer biomarkers for clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review may be used in clinical settings and in designing and developing of the novel non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis and pathological condition of patients with GI cancers. CLINICALTRIAL CRD 42017057129

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.011
Bibliometrics0.0140.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207